City of Arabel
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    ray of fire is not an unlimited cantrip

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Closed Bugs
    6 Posts 5 Posters 400 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • CadizC
      Cadiz
      last edited by

      Area name:
      Issue Location:
      Quest Name:
      Store Name:
      NPC Name:
      NPC Location:
      Server Version:
      Screen Shot:
      Time: https://www.timeanddate.com/

      Issue Description: as above ray of fire is a single use cantrip, rather than unlimited.

      it is the one with the highest damage, but has no extra effects for spell focuses unlike the others

      Zool's rule - don't be a dick.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote
      • EchoE
        Echo
        last edited by

        fix attempted v6733

        "You can complain if you weren't asked; you can't complain if you were asked but didn't contribute." ~ Professor.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote
        • EchoE
          Echo
          last edited by

          Fix didnt work.
          Need help from Builder's Guild
          @farglenargle @lunatichigh @Sljppers

          "You can complain if you weren't asked; you can't complain if you were asked but didn't contribute." ~ Professor.

          ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote
          • SpiffyMeisterS
            SpiffyMeister
            last edited by

            I recall we purposefully didn't add this to the unlimited cantrip. Something something about it doing more damage than the counterparts? I don't quite recall.

            Puffy's bumbling Scum-goblin minion.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote
            • HaquinH
              Haquin
              last edited by Haquin

              Should be fixed next reset.

              -- NOT! Still working on it

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote
              • ?
                A Former User @Echo
                last edited by A Former User

                Fixed and verified. 6767

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote
                • 1 / 1
                • First post
                  Last post